Corporate Sustainability December 2026
Q.1: GreenFuture Ltd., a global apparel company, is launching an ambitious sustainability program targeting eco-friendly sourcing and waste reduction. The initiative faces divergent expectations: investors demand financial returns, NGOs push for ethical labor standards, and local communities are concerned about job security. The project manager wants a structured, data-driven approach to map all relevant stakeholders, evaluate their power and interest, and devise an engagement plan that minimizes conflict while promoting innovation and long-term value. Based on the scenario, how should the company utilize Mendelow’s Matrix to identify, categorize, and prioritize its stakeholders to ensure effective resource allocation and sustainable decision-making?
Answer:
Introduction:
Mendelow’s Matrix is a stakeholder management model that enables the organisation to understand what stakeholders can influence their project and who is most influenced by it. The diagram categorises stakeholders based on two dimensions: power and interest. Power is defined as an ability to influence the decisions, resources or project, and interest is defined as an involvement in or concern for the outcome. For GreenFuture Ltd. such matrix is essential, given that the sustainability programme is influenced by diverse stakeholders that care about different aspects of the project. Investors are interested in the financial profits of the project, NGOs are concerned with the ethical labour practices, while the local community is interested in job opportunities and additional revenues. Other influential stakeholders include suppliers, employees, customers, regulators and management.
This is partially solved sample answer
Buy complete NMIMS solved assignments for the December 2026 session.
General/Generic Assignment at just ₹180 per assignment.
Customized/ Unique Assignment at just ₹500 per assignment.
Contact No: +91 9741410271 (WhatsApp)
OR
Mail to: smu.assignment@gmail.com
Q.2 (A): A city is experiencing rapid urbanization, leading to increased energy demand, vehicular congestion, and inefficient waste collection. The city planning department is exploring the integration of AI-powered traffic prediction, IoT sensor networks for utilities, blockchain for transparent governance, and digital twins for infrastructure simulation into its smart city agenda. However, limited budget and public concern over data privacy challenge the rollout of these technologies, necessitating clear prioritization and value justification Evaluate the effectiveness and risks of integrating these digital technologies for sustainable urban transformation. How should the city prioritize its technological investments to achieve maximum societal and environmental impact while managing cost and privacy concerns? Support your answer with reasoned justification.
Answer:
Introduction:
The growth of cities puts stress on transport, energy, waste, and public facilities. The application of digital technologies can help to address these issues. Artificial Intelligence, Internet of Things, blockchain, and digital twins are examples of disruptive technologies that can be beneficial in the development of a smart city. However, there are financial, technical, cybersecurity, and privacy risks associated with their implementation. For this reason, it is not necessary to introduce all technologies at once. Moreover, different solutions have varying degrees of social, economic, and environmental importance, as well as require different levels of investment and data security.
Q.2 (B): A multinational food and beverage company aims to demonstrate its commitment to the UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). The sustainability committee is mapping its business initiatives to relevant SDGs, including affordable energy, decent work, and climate action. However, opinion is divided over whether selective reporting on a few high-performing areas constitutes effective SDG engagement or risks being perceived as ‘SDG-washing’. NGO partners argue for a more holistic and transparent approach, while marketing advocates for highlighting the most positive impacts. Evaluate the challenges and consequences of selective versus comprehensive SDG alignment in corporate sustainability reporting. Critically assess how the company should approach SDG mapping and disclosure to ensure credibility, stakeholder confidence, and long-term reputational value.
Answer:
Introduction:
The practice of corporate sustainability reporting is explicitly associated with the United Nations’ Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). The main reason is that stakeholders want to ensure that the company does not merely pay lip service to the concept of contributing to sustainable development. The company under analysis operates in the food and beverage industry. Therefore, some of the SDGs that the company might consider include affordable and clean energy, decent work, and responsible consumption and production, among others. Although it is essential to report on the initiatives that have helped the company to achieve sustainability, disclosing only the successful experiences might undermine the business’s credibility.