International Marketing June 2026
Q.1: An American pharmaceutical company is preparing to enter a rapidly growing Southeast Asian market. The region has recently enacted new protectionist policies, including high import tariffs and restrictions on ownership of foreign subsidiaries. In addition, there is growing political unrest, with debates about nationalization of the healthcare sector. The company is attracted by potential profits but is concerned about the risk of asset seizure and political instability, which could impact its long-term investments. Apply the principles of political risk analysis and risk mitigation to evaluate the primary challenges this company faces. What practical strategies should its leadership implement to protect assets and ensure successful market entry, given the sovereignty concerns and risk of expropriation?
Answer:
Introduction:
The process of entering an international market can create both risks and opportunities for the company that is looking to enter that market, especially if the country has unstable political or regulatory environments. For example, the American pharmaceutical company is trying to enter a Southeast Asian country that has a very high rate of growth because the demand for health care has continued to increase; however, this country has a number of protectionist policies, such as high tariffs on imports and restrictions on foreign investment, which will make it very difficult and expensive for the company to enter the market. In addition, there is a lot of political instability in this country and a discussion around the government taking over the health care system, which will add to the uncertainty of investing in this market. The combination of these factors creates what is called political risk because these factors represent the risk that the actions of the government or political events could materially affect the ability of a business to operate or continue to invest in a certain market.
This is partially solved sample answer
Buy complete NMIMS solved assignments for the June 2026 session.
General/Generic Assignment at just ₹200 per assignment.
Customized/ Unique Assignment at just ₹500 per assignment.
Contact No: +91 9741410271 (WhatsApp)
OR
Mail to: smu.assignment@gmail.com
Q.2 (A): A European renewable energy firm is planning to expand into India’s rapidly growing market but is concerned about high regulatory complexity, capital requirements, and policy unpredictability. Local government incentives favor partnerships between foreign and domestic firms with a focus on sustainability and knowledge transfer. The firm is considering forming a joint venture with an established Indian energy company to share costs, manage political risk, and align with India’s Make in India and Digital India initiatives. However, some executives argue for entering independently to retain full profit and control over intellectual property. Evaluate the joint venture versus independent entry strategies for the European firm in this context.
Answer:
Introduction:
There are many potential benefits to entering India's renewable energy market, including increasing demand for electricity, increasing government support for renewable energy development, and increased interest in sustainability. Nevertheless, the Indian renewable energy market is highly complex due to various factors such as regulation, high capital requirements, and uncertainty surrounding future policies. A European firm must consider carefully how they will enter into the Indian renewable energy market by developing an entry strategy that considers balancing the firm's risk, level of control over the investment, and the long-term potential for growth and profitability. These entry strategies may be either jointly investing with a local partner or independently investing in the market; both of these options have pros/cons regarding cost-sharing, understanding of local markets, level of control, and ultimate returns on investment.
Q.2 (B): A multinational beverage company plans to launch its core soft drink product simultaneously in the United States and Indonesia. While the product has universal appeal, marketing research reveals significant differences in consumer expectations Indonesian consumers associate vibrant packaging and eco-friendly materials with higher quality, whereas American consumers focus more on brand storytelling and wellness messaging. Senior management is debating whether to adopt a standardized packaging and communication strategy or to adapt both for each market, considering costs, brand consistency, and cultural relevance. Evaluate the benefits and drawbacks of standardizing versus adapting both packaging and communication strategies in this scenario. Also mention the approach you would recommend with a brief justification.
Answer:
Introduction:
A multinational drink manufacturer has to consider whether they will apply the same marketing strategy in all the countries they sell in or whether they should change the approach based on regional differences. This is a very important consideration as consumer behaviour can differ dramatically between countries, for instance the USA and Indonesia. The product may be suitable to consumers worldwide, but it may be packaged and communicated to consumers very differently between countries. For example, in Indonesia, consumers like bright coloured eco-friendly packaging whereas in the USA, consumers prefer packages that have stories about the different brands and that offer health-related messages.