Emotional Intelligence December 2026
Q.1: Department head at a multinational corporation is promoted to oversee two new, culturally diverse teams. Initial meetings reveal hesitancy among team members to voice opinions, and collaboration is limited by misunderstandings. The leader recognizes that without understanding their own emotional triggers and biases, they may unintentionally reinforce divisions or overlook key perspectives. The leader seeks to enhance self-awareness, reduce blind spots, and foster openness through multi-rater EI assessment (360 degree) and self-reflection. How should the leader apply the behavioral component of self-awareness, particularly using self-reflection and multi-rater EI assessment (360 degree), to build both personal insight and a culture of trust within these new teams? What steps can be implemented to ensure emotionally intelligent decision-making in this multicultural setting?
Answer:
Introduction:
Self-awareness is an essential component of emotional intelligence for leaders. This allows them to understand themselves better by learning about their feelings, actions, strengths, weaknesses, and also about their biases. At the same time, in a multicultural company, there are bound to be misunderstandings concerning communication, relations with the superiors, methods of proving a point, and other issues. Therefore, in the given scenario, the department head should not rely on assumptions when communicating with the employees and address the concerns caused by the lack of involvement and expression of opinions. First, the behavioral component of the leader’s self-awareness entails focusing on the influence of their emotions and actions on the staff. Because of this, the leader is able to reflect on their own emotional reactions and responses. At the same time, the 360-degree emotional intelligence assessment can help the leader identify blind spots by comparing the feedback from their managers, colleagues, and subordinates with their self-appraisal.
This is partially solved sample answer
Buy complete NMIMS solved assignments for the December 2026 session.
General/Generic Assignment at just ₹180 per assignment.
Customized/ Unique Assignment at just ₹500 per assignment.
Contact No: +91 9741410271 (WhatsApp)
OR
Mail to: smu.assignment@gmail.com
Q.2 (A): During a critical leadership succession planning exercise, the HR team at an IT firm considers using both Salovey and Mayer's ability model and Goleman's mixed model to assess candidates. The team is divided: some believe ability-based testing ensures objective measurement, while others argue that mixed models capture real-world leadership behaviours better. Evaluate the suitability of these two emotional intelligence assessment approaches for leadership selection, considering their objectivity and relevance to job performance.
Answer:
Introduction:
The concept of emotional intelligence (EI) is vital in leadership as it helps leaders to control their emotions and also control the emotions of other people. During the succession planning process, the HR team should be able to identify candidates who can demonstrate high EI skills in terms of addressing interpersonal challenges at work. Salovey and Mayer’s ability model and Goleman’s mixed model present two different approaches to assessing EI. Indeed, while the ability model tends to focus on measuring emotional abilities which are measurable, the mixed model is made up of both emotional and non-emotional elements, such as personality and social skills. In this regard, the ability and mixed models are equally good choices for assessing candidates for succession planning but the use of the two models has certain drawbacks.
Q.2 (B): Rajesh, a highly analytical project manager at a financial services firm, consistently achieves targets on technically challenging projects. Despite his high IQ test results, his team members report feeling unsupported, which has led to increased turnover and declining productivity. The HR department is debating whether to introduce formal EQ assessments in its leadership pipeline, but some executives argue that technical proficiency should remain the key criterion for advancement. Evaluate the relative importance of including emotional quotient (EQ) assessments alongside traditional IQ metrics for leadership readiness at this firm.
Answer:
Introduction:
The main problem that Rajesh and his subordinates experienced demonstrated that the IQ is not the only determinant of successful leadership. Even though Rajesh is a genius who works well on hard tasks, he does not support his subordinates, which causes their low productivity and voluntary leaving. The concept of the Emotional Quotient (EQ) implies that individuals who understand and control their emotions, as well as comprehend the emotions of others, have an advantage over those who lack emotional control and stability. Therefore, the financial services firm must consider conducting the EQ assessments in addition to IQ ones, even though the technical proficiency is still under evaluation.