Performance Management System December 2026
Q.1: Sigma Innovations, a software development company, has recently experienced challenges in retaining top young talent. Management recognises that, despite competitive pay, many new hires feel disconnected from the company's values and are hesitant to seek guidance from more experienced colleagues. To transform this, Sigma's HR team proposes a comprehensive mentoring culture, making mentoring a central component of employee development and accountability. The programme plans to use storytelling, skill-based matching, and regular feedback, and alignment organisational values and mentoring relationships at all levels. Based on the scenario, how should Sigma Innovations apply the foundational elements of a strong mentoring culture to create an environment where employees value and voluntarily participate in mentoring relationships? Your answer should suggest specific strategies that embed mentoring into daily organisational practice while ensuring alignment with company values and promoting accountability.
Answer:
Introduction:
Mentoring is a developmental practice, in which a more experienced employee supports the professional growth of their colleague. In the case of Sigma Innovations, the issue is not associated with the level of compensation, as young employees are already offered attractive salaries. However, the key issue here is the lack of affiliation among young employees with the institution and their reluctance to consult more experienced people. Therefore, it is evident that Sigma Innovations is facing a challenge of inadequate mentoring culture. Such a situation might require the establishment of appropriate communication channels, as a strong mentoring culture enables one to learn how the organization operates, acquire new professional competencies, and develop contacts with influential figures. In this regard, Sigma Innovations should consider taking action to make mentoring a regular and integral part of everyday interactions, which can be achieved through storytelling, establishing connections based on particular skills, practicing frequent feedback, leadership example, and enhanced accountability. Furthermore, mentoring practices should align with Sigma’s values, so that employees understand what needs to be done and how they need to behave, in order to achieve organizational goals.
This is partially solved sample answer
Buy complete NMIMS solved assignments for the December 2026 session.
General/Generic Assignment at just ₹180 per assignment.
Customized/ Unique Assignment at just ₹500 per assignment.
Contact No: +91 9741410271 (WhatsApp)
OR
Mail to: smu.assignment@gmail.com
Q.2 (A): In a large manufacturing company, the HR department adopted the forced distribution method to differentiate employee performance levels during yearly appraisals. However, the new system led to highly motivated employees being placed in the lowest tier, resulting in demotivation, increased grievances, and allegations of unfair treatment. Several department heads argue that the forced curve does not accurately capture unique team dynamics or actual employee contributions. Analyse the impact of the forced distribution method for performance appraisal on morale, fairness, and the ability to reward genuine high performers.
Answer:
Introduction:
Forced distribution is a performance appraisal approach that calls for distributing employees into specific categories of high, average, and low performers based on a particular set of percentages. The manufacturing company adopted this technique for identifying its employees but encountered problems concerning the motivation of the employees and their accomplishments. Indeed, the forced distribution approach assumes that the employees’ performance is ranked against the peer group, which contributes to the decreased worker productivity and morale, grievances, and loss of trust in the organization.
Q.2 (B): A large Indian pharmaceutical company, Medico Ltd., is facing difficulties with outdated performance management practices that mainly focus on quantitative results (e.g., sales numbers and production targets), leading to employee disengagement and stifled innovation. Senior management now wants to shift to a competency-based performance management system (CB-PMS) by adopting clear role descriptions, competency mapping, and integrated assessment tools. However, some department heads express concerns that a focus on behaviours over outcomes may lead to inefficiencies and under-recognition of high performers. Critically evaluate the implications of balancing behavioural competencies and outcome-based results in Medico Ltd.'s transition to a CB-PMS.
Answer:
Introduction:
Medico Ltd. is experiencing the challenge typical to many businesses, where employees are rewarded solely on quantifiable performance criteria, such as sales, production, and targets. Though these are valid measurements, they are merely the result and not the method of achieving the result. The competency-based performance management system (CB-PMS) focuses on employee behaviours and competencies directly related to the former. For a pharmaceutical company, such abilities as teamwork, innovativeness, compliance, communication, and problem-solving, applied in the workplace daily, are essential factors in the success of an employee. However, the emphasis on process may limit attention to the outcomes, which is why Medico Ltd. should implement a balanced CB-PMS, which incorporates both employee behaviours and outcome-based indicators.