Total Quality Management December 2026
Q.1: A food processing facility is concerned about escalating costs due to frequent rework, rejected batches, and warranty service for defective products. A detailed review of cost of quality (COQ) reveals a disproportionate focus on appraisal and failure costs, with limited investment in prevention activities. Management decides to implement activity-based costing (ABC) to trace quality-related expenses to specific processes and identify opportunities for cost optimisation. How should management integrate activity-based costing data with cost of quality categories to prioritise preventive quality investments? Demonstrate how this combined approach can inform strategic decisions for resource allocation and sustainable cost reduction.
Answer:
Introduction:
In a food processing plant, poor quality results in very high costs in terms of rework, waste, delays, complaints, and warranty services. These costs are difficult for the management to control by looking only at the overall expense related to quality. Cost of Quality (COQ) helps in organising the costs related to quality into categories such as prevention, appraisal, internal failure, and external failure. Nevertheless, the problem with COQ is that it does not indicate the production activity or process that causes these costs. ABC method may be used to identify the activities and processes causing these costs.
Management can use ABC data in combination with the categories of COQ to understand where the costs of quality originate, and to evaluate whether additional prevention would yield significant savings by cutting expensive failures. For instance, if ABC determines that inappropriate cleaning procedures result in a large percentage of rejected batches, management can use ABC estimates of the cost of additional preventive cleaning controls, and weigh them against the current cost of failures. Through this process, a firm can move from responding to quality problems to preventing them, and obtain substantial savings and improvement through the right allocation of resources.
This is partially solved sample answer
Buy complete NMIMS solved assignments for the December 2026 session.
General/Generic Assignment at just ₹180 per assignment.
Customized/ Unique Assignment at just ₹500 per assignment.
Contact No: +91 9741410271 (WhatsApp)
OR
Mail to: smu.assignment@gmail.com
Q.2 (A): A startup consumer electronics brand is planning to launch a smart home hub aimed at young professionals in metro areas. To accelerate time-to-market, the company's R&D team plans to streamline the product design by benchmarking only against technical features offered by leading competitors. However, after a pilot launch, user feedback highlights dissatisfaction with voice command accuracy and device compatibility, factors not prioritized during development. The CEO is now considering the introduction of QFD to ensure true customer needs are incorporated, but worries about the financial and resource impact on a lean startup. Assess the strategic trade-offs between a competitor-focused design process and customer-centric deployment through QFD. Evaluate how effective QFD implementation, even with limited resources, could improve customer satisfaction and the startup's market position. Provide a justified recommendation for the CEO.
Answer:
Introduction:
While competitor benchmarking can help a startup to accelerate the introduction of its product to the market and to reduce the costs of development, the features of competitors’ products do not always reflect customers’ actual needs. Although the considered example included technical specifications borrowed from the most successful companies, the described scenario demonstrates that customers were unsatisfied with the quality of voice command recognition and the device compatibility. The application of Quality Function Deployment (QFD) methodology makes it possible to create a customer-oriented product by transforming customer expectations and requirements into performance and technical specifications. Whereas QFD requires more efforts than competitive benchmarking analysis, it is an efficient tool in mitigating the possible failures connected with consumer reception of the product. QFD helps to prioritize the features that should be integrated into a product based on the degree of their importance for customers.
Q.2 (B): ‘GreenHarvest Foods’ is contemplating a transition from a transactional supplier model to a partnership-based approach. Currently, GreenHarvest sources fresh produce from the cheapest suppliers available, leading to frequent supplier changes, inconsistent quality, high inspection costs, and occasional supply shortfalls. The leadership is concerned about risks but hesitates to invest in supplier development due to potential increases in initial costs and resource demands. At the same time, the competitive market is emphasizing traceable, high-quality sourcing. Evaluate the sustainability, risk, and brand implications of GreenHarvest's current transactional supplier policy versus a proposed long-term partnership model. Assess which model offers superior value in the context of total quality management, justifying your recommendation with areas for further improvement.
Answer:
Introduction:
The current supplier strategy for GreenHarvest Foods involves transactional supplier strategy where the selection of suppliers is done based on the lowest cost of purchase. Although the above strategy might help in minimizing costs, it can cause inconsistencies in quality, disruption of supply, inspection costs, and operational problems. Partnership strategy of selecting the supplier involves developing a relationship with the suppliers and improving their ability to manage quality and supply. In the concept of Total Quality Management (TQM), the quality must be designed into the supply process. Therefore, GreenHarvest Foods should adopt the partnership supplier strategy based on total value.