International Finance December 2026
Q.1: A newly industrializing country is seeking to stabilize its currency as it faces significant capital inflows, increasing exchange rate volatility, and periodic balance of payment deficits. The finance ministry is debating whether adopting a fixed exchange rate system similar to the Bretton Woods model or transitioning to a managed float would best support the country's economic growth and global competitiveness. The central bank is particularly concerned about the implications for monetary policy autonomy and long-term financial stability in a globalized environment. Apply the merits and demerits of fixed, floating, and managed float exchange rate systems to analyze which framework would be most suitable for the country's current situation. What decision would you recommend to the central bank, and how should the chosen system address both exchange rate stability and flexibility?
Answer:
Introduction:
Exchange rate policy is an important decision for a newly industrializing country, as the value of its currency affects exports, imports, inflation, foreign investment and economic growth. In the present situation, the country is experiencing large capital inflows, exchange rate volatility and occasional balance of payments deficits. Therefore, it would need a system which could provide reasonable degree of currency stability without removing the central bank's ability to respond to changing economic conditions. A fixed exchange rate (such as the system associated with the Bretton Woods period) can provide strong stability but may lead to restrictions of monetary policy and require building up large foreign exchange reserves. An entirely floating arrangement would offer much higher monetary autonomy, although would be subject to significant exchange rate volatility. It is a compromise approach where the market decides the exchange rate while the central bank can intervene in case of abnormal movements of the exchange rate. For the country's present circumstances, a managed floating exchange rate system would be most suitable.
This is partially solved sample answer
Buy complete NMIMS solved assignments for the December 2026 session.
General/Generic Assignment at just ₹180 per assignment.
Customized/ Unique Assignment at just ₹500 per assignment.
Contact No: +91 9741410271 (WhatsApp)
OR
Mail to: smu.assignment@gmail.com
Q.2 (A): An analyst is comparing the relationship between inflation rates and exchange rate movements of two countries, India and Country X, over three consecutive years. Relevant data is shown below: Year 1, India's Inflation Rate: 4%, Country X Inflation Rate: 1.5%, Actual Change in INR/X Unit Exchange Rate: 2.0%; Year 2, India's Inflation Rate: 6%, Country X Inflation Rate: 2.0%, Actual Change in INR/X Unit Exchange Rate: 3.8%; Year 3, India's Inflation Rate: 5%, Country X Inflation Rate: 2.5%, Actual Change in INR/X Unit Exchange Rate: 3.1%. (a) Using Relative Purchasing Power Parity theory, compute the theoretical percentage change in the INR/X Unit exchange rate for each year. (b) Compare the theoretical values to actual movements and provide a step-wise quantitative analysis of whether PPP under- or over-predicts currency depreciation in each year. Support your reasoning with calculations and interpretations.
Answer:
Introduction:
Purchasing Power Parity (PPP) describes the relationship between inflation rates of two countries and their exchange rate. According to Relative PPP, the country with a higher rate of inflation will see its currency depreciating against the currency of the country with the lower rate of inflation. Inflation in India exceeds that of Country X in all three years, suggesting that the INR will depreciate against Country X’s currency. The assessment will compare the depreciation predicted by the PPP theory to the actual exchange rate changes in order to establish whether the PPP theory under or over-predicted depreciation.
Q.2 (B): A leading multinational corporation (MNC) has operated successfully in Country X, but a recent economic downturn has prompted the central bank to tighten foreign exchange controls and impose strict dividend restrictions. The MNC's subsidiary is now required to retain 70% of after-tax profits locally, and approval for repatriating even the capped dividends is often delayed by bureaucracy. Additionally, the host country's currency has shown signs of heightened volatility, exposing blocked profits to potential devaluation. The MNC's finance team is considering reinvestment of blocked funds versus employing transfer pricing and management fee mechanisms to extract value, all while observing compliance requirements. As the financial director, critically evaluate which strategy, local reinvestment or aggressive financial structuring (using transfer pricing and management fees), offers a more sustainable solution to preserving and maximizing the MNC's value in the face of government controls. Justify your decision by weighing the long-term financial, regulatory, and reputational risks and benefits.
Answer:
Introduction:
An MNC that is faced with foreign exchange control has a situation where it has to balance short term versus long term profit making. The requirement of retaining 70% of the profits after tax and the late dividend approval becomes a problem for the MNC. Either it will invest the funds locally in the country or use transfer pricing and management fees. The aggressive financial strategy will bring it trouble with tax, regulatory and reputation. Hence, the MNC should think of local reinvestment and inter-company costs.